A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents on the boy or Woman tend not to approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they will cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with check here the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based within the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a regulation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, instead than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
Problems or Errors When you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a bad link or possibly a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't thorough, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.